Brand new responses of knowledge regarding the cervical malignant tumors evaluation and you may HPV was in fact analyzed by for every single item just before rating categorization

Brand new responses of knowledge regarding the cervical malignant tumors evaluation and you may HPV was in fact analyzed by for every single item just before rating categorization

Mathematical data

Of 14 inquiries from cervical malignant tumors testing, female whose score was indeed ? ten was in fact randomly classified because with ‘an excellent knowledge’ or else was basically considered as which have “not good training”. To own experience in HPV, female whose respond to is actually ‘never been aware of HPV’ have been excluded throughout the data regarding HPV education.

Regarding 5 issues, women whose score have been ? step three was indeed thought to be with ‘a hendes kommentar er her good experience with HPV’ otherwise as the ‘not good knowledge’. Out of 19 questions, feminine whoever score had been ? thirteen was categorized as having ‘good total knowledge’ normally due to the fact ‘bad total knowledge’.

All analysis was basically amassed from inside the a digital database and you may assessed using SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to research market analysis and you can was summarized as wide variety having fee, indicate which have fundamental deviation or median that have diversity. Brand new connection between for each and every variable and you will education score was indeed examined having fun with simple linear regression. Exploratory design is made during the multivariable studies and all details possibly related to the details get. New noticed number of analytical benefits is actually an effective p-worth of 0.05 or reduced.

Overall performance

Out of 500 ladies who met addition criteria and were allowed into the analysis, you to definitely ong 499 ladies who taken care of immediately brand new questionnaire on degree of cervical malignant tumors and you can screening (area II) and you may understanding of HPV (area II), a few did not promote personal information. Thus demographic data were in only 497 female (Table step 1). This new imply age 497 players try years (SD ± ). More than half of users was basically old Table step one. Socio-monetary attribute (N = 497).

New indications getting colposcopy was abnormal cervical cytology having presence away from HR-HPV (155; 30.2%), abnormal cytology with bad or unfamiliar out of Hr-Horsepower (274; 55.1%), presence regarding only Hr-HPV (65; 13.1%), or simply history of CIN (3; 0.6%) (Dining table dos).

Centered on for each question in the cervical cancers evaluation (Dining table step 3), 95.4% out of 499 female misinterpreted that women will likely be screened having cervical cancer tumors (Q step one). Whenever 55% to help you 70% know when you should start and you will frequency out-of testing (Q dos–4). Yet not, merely 17.4% and you will thirty six.3%was indeed conscious that new screening wasn’t needed subsequent–once hysterectomy to own non-cervical cancer tumors (Q 5) or shortly after 65 many years that have reputation of repeatedly regular prior review (Q 6).

To your types of examination (Q 7–14), 79% regarding professionals was aware there had been of several assessment measures (Q 7). Yet not, merely 7.2% had degree one cervical screening was over at that time off pelvic test (Q 8). The participants was in fact regularly cervical cytologic evaluation (Q ten; 93.8%), HPV analysis (Q eleven; 89.2%), co-evaluation (Q a dozen; 92.4%) however with artwork examination after acetic acid (VIA) which had been understood in only 29.7% (Q 9). Additionally, 57.7% and 65.3% off people got misconception one cervical disease evaluating could be done from the imaging (Q thirteen) and you can blood test to possess cyst markers (Q 14), correspondingly.

To possess knowledge of HPV, 110 members (20.0%) got never heard about HPV. One of many leftover 389 participants, most (ninety five.5%) realized you to definitely HPV illness is preventable and 85.1% were conscious that it’s avoidable by the vaccination. Though majority (ninety.5%) knew one cervical malignant tumors comes from oncogenic HPV, just about half know it may be prevented by steering clear of sexual craft otherwise venereal wart comes from non-oncogenic HPV.

I analyzed experience with the participants of the score (Dining table 4). The fresh mean scores of people to have experience in cervical disease examination (Letter = 499) and of HPV (Letter = 389) was ± dos.37 (regarding fourteen questions) and 3.53 ± step one.11 (of 5 questions), respectively. Because of the categorization, 26.9% and 20.1% had a knowledge of cervical malignant tumors assessment and you may HPV respectively. The fresh new suggest sum get of real information on the cervical cancer tumors evaluation and you may HPV had been ± 2.87 (out-of 19 concerns), with just twenty five.2% had a great complete education.